Darel Rex Finley in PhotoBooth

Funny iPhone Party-Poopers

2008.07.21   prev     next

A simple, juicy collection of anti-iPhone absurdity from a seemingly endless series of iPhone naysayers, as featured on Daring Fireball, Fake Steve, Macalope, RoughlyDrafted, AppleInsider, and elsewhere. I’ll add to this page as more yummy morsels become available.

jump to bottom

Ed Colligan of Palm (November 2006):

“We’ve learned and struggled for a few years here figuring out how to make a decent phone. PC guys are not going to just figure this out. They’re not going to just walk in.”

Michael Kanellos of CNET (December 2006):

“Apple is slated to come out with a new phone. Reports say that it will have a slide-out keyboard, 4GB or 8GB of storage, and work on CDMA or GSM cellular networks. It will start at $249 before subscription rebates. And it will largely fail.”

“Sales for the phone will skyrocket initially. However, things will calm down, and the Apple phone will take its place on the shelves with the random video cameras, cell phones, wireless routers and other would-be hits.”

“[T]he iPod looks like it may turn out to be a non-repeatable experience. Look at the historical record. When the iPod emerged in late 2001, it solved some major problems with MP3 players. ... Unfortunately for Apple, problems like that don’t exist in the handset business. Cell phones aren’t clunky, inadequate devices. Instead, they are pretty good. Really good.”

“[W]hen consumers get to that counter at CompUSA, they will debate buying the Apple phone, and even hold it up for a look. But when they whip out the credit card, they’ll probably opt for a Motorola.”

Bill Ray of The Register (December 2006):

“[T]he Apple phone will fail, and fail badly”

“Mobile phones are not complex to use because of bad interface design, they are complex to use because they are complex devices with a myriad of features.”

“As customers start to realise that the competition offers better functionality at a lower price, by negotiating a better subsidy, sales [of the Apple phone] will stagnate. After a year a new version will be launched, but it will lack the innovation of the first and quickly vanish.

The only question remaining is if, when the iPod phone fails, it will take the iPod with it.”

Rob Enderle of the Enderle Group (January 2007):

“I’m not convinced that Apple’s going to benefit from this particular trend, primarily because there are other vendors that are better positioned to address what the iPhone represents.”

“It’s clearly going to start a wave towards a new technology — as I say, I’m not convinced that Apple’s going to be able to ride this wave.”

Philip Solis in ABIresearch (January 2007):

“[T]he Apple iPhone is not a smartphone.”

Jack Gold on Computerworld (January 2007):

“Will anyone answer when Apple iPhones home?”

“Can it succeed? Frankly, and contrary to the reactions of Apple fans and the stock market, I am pretty skeptical.”

“Why am I not impressed?”

“[W]ho is the target for this device?”

“[T]he device runs the Mac OS. This is a major constraint, since few third-party application vendors ... run on the Mac.”

“So, will the iPhone succeed? At some level, yes, given the cachet that the Apple brand carries and the company’s base of loyal fans.”

John C. Dvorak on CNBC (January 2007):

“To me, I’m looking at this thing [the iPhone], and I think it’s kinda trending against what people are really liking in phones nowadays, which are those little keypads — I mean, the Blackjack from Samsung, the BlackBerry obviously kinda pushes this thing, the Palm ... some of these stocks went down on the Apple announcement, thinking that Apple can do no wrong. But I think Apple can do wrong, and I think this is it.”

Randall Stross in The New York Times (January 2007):

“Want an iPhone? Beware the iHandcuffs”

“[L]ike its slimmer iPod siblings, the iPhone’s music-playing function will be limited by factory-installed ‘crippleware.’ ... Apple officially calls its own standard ‘FairPlay,’ but fair it is not.”

“Even if you are ready to pledge a lifetime commitment to the iPod as your only brand of portable music player or to the iPhone as your only cellphone once it is released, you may find that FairPlay copy protection will, sooner or later, cause you grief. You are always going to have to buy Apple stuff. Forever and ever.”

“Unlike Apple, Microsoft has been willing to license its copy-protection software to third-party hardware vendors.”

“Apple pretends that the decision to use copy protection is out of its hands.”

Matthew Lynn of Bloomberg (January 2007):

“Apple iPhone Will Fail in a Late, Defensive Move”

“To its many fans, Apple is more of a religious cult than a company. An iToaster that downloads music while toasting bread would probably get the same kind of worldwide attention.

Don’t let that fool you into thinking that it matters. The big competitors in the mobile-phone industry such as Nokia Oyj and Motorola Inc. won’t be whispering nervously into their clamshells over a new threat to their business.

The iPhone is nothing more than a luxury bauble that will appeal to a few gadget freaks.”

Rob Enderle of the Enderle Group (January 2007):

“[T]he iPod came to market as a unique product line that remained largely differentiated through most of its life. Thanks to the Prada phone the iPhone isn’t even unique now and because of the power of the carriers, most of which aren’t Cingular, has a massive uphill battle that the iPod didn’t enjoy.”

Richard Sprague of Microsoft (January 2007):

“I can’t believe the hype being given to iPhone.”

“I just have to wonder who will want one of these things (other than the religious faithful).”

“So please mark this post and come back in two years to see the results of my prediction: I predict they will not sell anywhere near the 10M Jobs predicts for 2008.”

“[E]ven the most diehard Mac fans who buy one of these will secretly carry two phones. One to prove how loyal and ‘cool’ they are, and the other to actually make and receive calls.”

Rob Enderle of the Enderle Group (January 2007):

“This will be a difficult year for Apple, and the iPhone could be more of a drag on earnings than a help.”

“Apple is clearly not going away — but this year, compared to last, will be really nasty for the company.”

John C. Dvorak on MarketWatch (March 2007):

“Apple should pull the plug on the iPhone”

“It’s the loyalists who keep promoting this device as if it is going to be anything other than another phone in a crowded market.”

“These phones go in and out of style so fast that unless Apple has half a dozen variants in the pipeline, its phone, even if immediately successful, will be passé within 3 months.

There is no likelihood that Apple can be successful in a business this competitive.”

“Even Microsoft itself has troubles with its attempts to get into a small sub segment of the handset business with its operating system.

What Apple risks here is its reputation as a hot company that can do no wrong. If it’s smart it will call the iPhone a ‘reference design’ and pass it to some suckers to build with someone else’s marketing budget. Then it can wash its hands of any marketplace failures.

It should do that immediately before it’s too late. Samsung Electronics Ltd. might be a candidate. Otherwise I’d advise you to cover your eyes. You’re not going to like what you’ll see.”

Steve Ballmer of Microsoft (April 2007):

“There’s no chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share. No chance.”

Geoff Long of CommsDay (June 2007):

“In a week or two the fuss will fade and people will start to realise an important point: it’s just a phone, and not a particularly ‘smart’ one at that.”

“Anyway, that’s my prediction and I felt like getting it in early — I don’t want to be seen jumping on bandwagons after everyone else suddenly realises that the iPhone is a flop.”

Dan Gillmor of Arizona State University (June 2007):

“The iPhone is a Beta Product”

“I’d advise anyone considering one of these devices in the U.S. to wait for the next version. The initial product doesn’t come close to living up to the hype.”

Al Ries of Ries & Ries (June 2007):

“When Apple introduces its iPhone this month, will it pass the acid test?

In my opinion, no.

Prediction No. 1: The iPhone will be a major disappointment.

The hype has been enormous. Apple says its iPhone is ‘literally five years ahead of any other mobile phone.’ A stock-market analyst says, ‘The iPhone has the potential to be even bigger than the iPod.’

I think not.”

Laura Ries of Ries & Ries (June 2007):

“The hype and intense media, consumer and Wall Street excitement comes from the impression that the iPhone will become another iPod ... Nothing could be further from the truth. If the iPod is the biggest success of the 21st century then iPhone is likely to be the biggest flop of the 21st century.”

“[A]ll convergence devices are doomed by compromise.

In order to produce an all-in-one device, the device has to make compromises: battery life is short, the device is difficult to use, it is too large and it is too expensive.

The iPhone will likely have problems with all these things.”

Brett Arends of TheStreet.com (June 2007):

“But beyond all the iHype and iMania, let’s get one thing clear. The iPhone isn’t the future. It isn’t a revolutionary mobile device ushering in a new era.”

Ken Dulaney of Gartner (June 2007):

“We’re telling IT executives to not support it because Apple has no intentions of supporting [iPhone use in] the enterprise.”

Brett Arends of TheStreet.com (July 2007):

“Hey — did you hear about the $17,670 iPhone?

No, it’s not a gold-plated version designed for Paris Hilton.

It’s the one everybody’s buying. The one in your local Apple store.”

“... the $2,720 [for an iPhone plus a two-year service plan] could have been invested tax free [if not already maxing-out your 401K]. Earning a pretty reasonable 5.5% after inflation over the next 35 years [starting at age 30], it would have grown to ... $17,670.

You read that right.”

Scott Moritz of TheStreet.com (July 2007):

“Apple’s iPhone missed a 1 million unit sales target and rivals are rejoicing.”

Ashok Kumar of Capital Group (July 2007):

“In the Harry Potter books, a squib is the offspring of a witch and wizard that lacks the ability to produce magic. In the technology world, the iPhone is a product from Apple teamed with the wireless network of AT&T that lacks the ability to produce magical business growth.”

Paul Thurrott, winsupersite.com (September 2007):

“And though this is a Windows-centric Web site, the iPhone is important to us all because it will impact the Windows-using world (i.e. ‘the world’) in two ways. Windows users are the mainstream and majority market for this device; we are the ones who use the iPhone. And as with the original Mac, it’s highly likely that the computing innovations seen first in the iPhone will popularize themselves further as Microsoft and other companies adapt them to their own products. Whatever happens, we’ll be able to trace a major form of computing in the future back to the iPhone just as we can now trace the modern PC back in time to the Mac.”

“I wrote this review for you, the fence sitter. The normal person. The guy who’s seen the constant iPhone ads on TV and in subway stations and has wondered if this thing, this expensive hunk of plastic, will actually solve some problems. The guy who, quite frankly, shouldn’t be wasting his hard earned cash on an expensive toy that, ultimately, doesn’t really solve any problems at all. The iPhone is awesome. There’s just one problem: You don’t need it.”

Brian Jepson on BIF Speak (October 2007):

“[Harvard’s Clayton] Christensen said his money is on Nokia to build a platform that disrupts the personal computer. ... I completely agree with Christensen ...”

“[M]y money’s on Nokia, too, for pretty much the same reasons Christensen has.”

Mike Lazaridis of RIM (November 2007):

“Try typing a web key on a touch screen on an iPhone, that’s a real challenge. You cannot see what you type.”

“The iPhone has severe limitations when it comes to effortless typing. Of course you have more screen space, with more artistic interactions, but that’s not enough. We’ve seen this before when Palm tried virtual keyboards. When they launched the Treo they licensed our keyboard.”

“It is like building high end cars. The top manufacturers make their present models a little better every year, but when they change it too much, that’s when they have a problem.”

Jim Balsillie of RIM (November 2007):

“Apple has come forward with a unique strategy — they have carriers propose to be their partner, they completely reversed the relationship to have full product management and full control over the pricing — but in the end we believe users want choice.”

Fred Wilson, of Union Square Ventures (November 2007):

“Fear and Loathing Is Not A Great Brand Image”

“I have a brand new iPhone sitting right next to me on my desk that I can’t figure out how to unlock and jailbreak now that it comes pre-loaded with 1.1.2 firmware. So it just sits there on my desk making me hate Apple more every day”

Mitchell Ashley of NetworkWorld.com (January 2008):

“iPhone will fail to dominate as so many other Apple products have failed to in the past. The iPhone is certain to fade into history as another cool Apple innovation, that others soon rushed competitive, like-products to market, blowing away any significant lead Apple might have.”

“Microsoft’s put a lot of thought into how to make the mobile phone interface more intuitive and easier to use, even more so than Apple’s iPhone.”

“Apple’s inability to gain any significant market share means the options for software products are much more limited and hardware is much more expensive.”

“Apple iPhone. Enjoy the limelight because it won’t last long.”

Roger L. Kay on Bloomberg Businessweek (March 2008):

“Apple’s Icarus Effect

Pride goes before destruction ...”

“Just as those living in shiny houses of self-righteous glass often end up surrounded by shards of their former sanctimony, so Apple Inc. now finds itself the increasingly appealing target of software hackers.”

“As hackers pillaged Microsoft’s Windows operating system, Apple stressed that its computer platform was relatively virus-free ...”

“Apple, welcome to Microsoft’s world!”

“Everyone makes mistakes. But society loves to repay hubris with derisive laughter.”

“Apple is becoming a victim of its own success, and the irony is just too great to miss. Anyone with a mild sense of history is keeping track.”

Mike Lazaridis of RIM (April 2008):

“I couldn’t type on it and I still can’t type on it, and a lot of my friends can’t type on it. It’s hard to type on a piece of glass.”

Mike Lazaridis of RIM (May 2008):

“We have to be realistic about the history of [touch-screen] technology. We have to remember that this is not new — this has been done, this has been tried before.”

[reporter: The most exciting mobile trend is...]

“Full Qwerty keyboards. I’m sorry, it really is. I’m not making this up.”

Manjit Singh of Chiquita Brands International (June 2008):

“I have nothing against iPhone. It’s great. But we’re a BlackBerry shop, and I don’t think iPhone brings anything new to the table. It has a great user experience, but that’s all.”

Gary Krakow of MSNBC (June 2008):

“Steve Jobs has to bite the bullet. He’s either gotta get BlackBerry on there, or Windows Mobile on there. It’s the entire answer.”

[reporter: Why isn’t he doing that?]

“Because I think he’d rather create a system that might be able to tap into these two different systems, but he’d rather do it himself, he’d rather find a way — or he’d rather get a lot of people going to an Apple system. I don’t think that’s gonna happen, I think BlackBerry is very entrenched. I think Microsoft also has a lot of people who are very, very happy with the Microsoft mobile e-mail system. Both have their plusses and minuses. Uh, not many minuses for either one. Apple doesn’t have it, and for Apple to tap into that they’re gonna have to bite the bullet and they’re going to have to make some sort of agreement. And you know what agreement means. They have to pay for the rights. And I don’t think they really wanna pay for the rights to either one or both of those systems.”

Paul Thurrott, winsupersite.com (June 2008, just after the WWDC keynote):

“So. Did Apple introduce anything surprising today? No, unless you count the price drop, which I previously noted was a requirement if Apple was serious about selling 10 million units this year. Apparently, they are quite serious. Long story short: I rescheduled the gym for this today? Geesh.”

Anita Hamilton of Time (July 2008):

“On July 11, Apple will launch its hotly anticipated iPhone App Store — and it’ll be anything but a bargain.”

Free Software Foundation, article by “johns” (July 2008):

“A snake oil salesman not satisfied with his business of pushing proprietary software and Digital Restrictions Management (DRM) technology into your home, Jobs has set his sights on getting DRM and proprietary software into your pocket as well.”

“Apple, through its marketing and visual design techniques, is manufacturing an illusion that merely buying an Apple makes you part of an alternative community. But the technology they use is explicitly chosen to divide people into separate digital cells, and to position Apple as sole warden. When your business depends on people paying for the privilege of being locked up, the prison better look and feel luxurious, and the bars better not be too visible. Wait, locked up? Prison? It’s a phone. Aren’t we being a little extreme? Unfortunately, we are not.”

Tom Yager of InfoWorld (July 2008):

“Apple’s iPhone contracts leave developers speechless

Apple’s free iPhone SDK may be the most hazardous download on the Internet”

“This isn’t Apple-bashing. This is serious business.”

“[T]he iPhone developer programs are the antithesis of the developer-friendly Apple Developer Connection”

Rick Merritt of EE Times (July 2008):

“Scroll ahead to say 2012. Apple will be struggling to roll out a broad product portfolio that matches the wealth of Android and Windows Mobile systems on the market. Once again they will lack the breadth of the backing of the open alternative, in this case Google’s Android.

More importantly, this market too will mature. Eventually, Apple will be fighting the Google hoards by rolling out a cool new feature here and there, but they will have nothing as compelling as the lower prices and greater diversity of the Android platform.

In short, the iPhone will help Apple rocket from nowhere to the top ten in cellphone makers in a couple short years. But five years out, Apple could be sidelined to a top 20 spot supported only by the remaining faithful few.

Steve Jobs is known for many things, but being teachable is not one of them.”

“Gadget Lab” of Wired (August 2008):

“Nokia E71 is a legit iPhone killer — we’re serious this time”

Dan Lyons of Newsweek (September 2008):

“I hate to say it but Apple may end up reliving its nightmare experience in the personal computer market — that is, arriving ahead of everyone else (in 1984) with a device that was really cool and really well built and really showed what the platform could do, but then keeping everything closed and thereby ending up a niche player.”

Eric Knorr on InfoWorld (September 2008):

“Why Android will crush the iPhone

The iPhone was a nice preview of next-gen mobile. But Android is the real thing, and will make iPhone and BlackBerry yesterday’s news”

“There will be many, many Android devices and carriers and pricing options. You see, Android is an open platform.”

“[T]o use the [iPhone] SDK, you need an Intel-based Mac and membership in the Apple Developer Connection. This is an exclusive club.”

Paul Boutin of ValleyWag (September 2008):

“Paul Betlem from Adobe balked at saying the [Adobe Flash] app was sure to be built into Apple’s Safari browser that ships with the phone, but it seems a certainty.”

Steve Ballmer of Microsoft (September 2008):

“[Apple and RIM] are probably restricted, in some sense, to a certain maximum. ... If you want to reach more people than that, you sort-of have to separate the hardware and the software issue.”

Shane Wall of Intel (October 2008):

“Any sort of application that requires any horse power at all and the iPhone struggles.”

“If you want to run full internet, you’re going to have to run an Intel-based architecture.”

Rob Enderle of the Enderle Group (October 2008):

“I’m not sure, under the current economic conditions, that [carrying an iPhone]’s a great statement to make. You may not want to flash it.”

Robbie Bach of Microsoft (October 2008):

“Does AT&T like having iPhone on its network? Sure. But they want to have balance in that ecosystem, where there’s three or four big partners. That’s why we’re so attractive to them — because we work with Samsung, Sony-Ericsson, LG, HTC, Motorola. Don’t get me wrong, the iPhone is a cool device. But it’s not about choice.”

Rob Enderle of the Enderle Group (October 2008):

“And the really cool thing [about Windows 7] is you actually get Multi-Touch, so it’s not just one finger, it is, presto-chango, two fingers — this one doesn’t seem to want to work. And you can expand — there we go.”

[reporter: And what does that remind you of?]

“It reminds me of a little phone by a company that’s named after a fruit.”

“It is very similar to what Apple does on phones but not PCs.”

Lucas Conley of the Boston Globe (October 2008):

“No doubt this will incite the ire of the iCult, but once you’re done flooding the forums and flaming the messenger, let’s all just take a deep breath.”

“The [Apple] brand’s true appeal comes from the fact that consumers are hooked on the hype.”

“But in an age when no-name companies make phones of equal quality at a fraction of the price of an iPhone, how long can Apple keep sales and its cool factor up? Only as long as it can sustain the hype. And with the Google phone on the horizon, it’s going to take a lot of hype.”

Rick Rashid of Microsoft (October 2008):

“If you use a Macintosh or an iPhone, which honestly I would not recommend, you would be using code that I wrote more than 25 years ago.”

Don Reisinger on CNET (November 2008):

“Apple is scared. And it should be.”

“[L]et’s face it: the number of shortcomings in the iPhone 3G far outweigh those found in the [BlackBerry] Storm.

Although [Apple] will never admit it ... you can bet that company executives are running scared Friday. Even though Apple created this category and revolutionized the market, RIM just one-upped the founders, and Apple knows that.”

“The iPhone was cool, up until yesterday.”

Dan Lyons of Newsweek (January 2009):

“[T]he Pre represents only a first shot. Rubinstein and his engineers are already preparing a family of devices that will run on the Palm Web OS. Could it be that Apple has staked out an early lead with a breakthrough product only to be passed by others? It’s happened before.”

Ed Colligan of Palm (January 2009):

“Why would we [sell the Pre for less than the iPhone] when we have a significantly better product?”

Priya Ganapati in Wired (January 2009):

“The Palm Pre has it all, making the iPhone look almost like — dare we say it — a version 1.0 device.”

John Cox in NetworkWorld (January 2009):

“From what I can see, [Pre’s cloud integration is] a step ahead of the iPhone, which has more narrowly focused this kind of integration around a proprietary, Apple-based service infrastructure.”

“Apple’s corporate ethos is ‘we’re cool and you’re not, use the product and bask in the coolness.’ Palm has the opportunity to crystallize a new corporate ethos more suited to the Web’s democratic openness ...”

Bill Snyder in InfoWorld (January 2009):

“iPhone apps: Fool’s gold for developers?

Selling mobile apps on Apple’s iPhone App Store may seem like a surefire recipe for success. It isn’t.”

“You need a critical mass of users — but you can’t get there if the iPhone is your only platform.”

“Limitations in the iPhone make great apps harder to deliver

What’s important to understand is that the iPhone application environment is very difficult ...”

Fred Wilson of Union Square Ventures (February 2009):

“Does Apple Have A Blind Spot About Flash?”

“[I]t’s very exciting to me that Flash is making a big move over the next year onto smartphones. ... The mobile web needs to be just like the web for innovation to flourish and capital to flow.”

“Apple is making a mistake by snubbing Adobe’s desire to get Flash on the iPhone.”

“I don’t think the iTunes/iPod strategy has much life left in it. Things like Pandora, MySpace Music, music blogging, and other forms of streaming music will eventually chip away at that franchise.”

Steve Ballmer of Microsoft (February 2009):

“[A]ll the consumer market mojo is with Apple and to a lesser extent BlackBerry. And yet, the real market momentum with operators and the real market momentum with device manufacturers seems to primarily be with Windows Mobile and Android.”

Roger McNamee of Elevation Partners, investors in Palm (March 2009):

“June 29, 2009, is the two-year anniversary of the first shipment of the iPhone. Not one of those people [whose 2-year service contracts expire] will still be using an iPhone a month later.”

“I’m on a 10-year plan, here. They are going to run out of gas way before we are.”

“The Pre going to be a million times — well, not a million times — several times faster than the iPhone.”

“The Pre is going to run rings around [Apple] on the Web.”

Ray Maguire of Sony (March 2009):

“The iPhone has the advantage of being a single device and is growing a reasonable installed base, but it doesn’t have the production power that a PSP has. As a specific games machine, the PSP is always going to win out.”

“We’re in a great position to take on the interest in these snacking games and produce them at better quality, lower prices, with lower cost of development”

Scott Moritz of TheStreet.com (March 2009):

“Apple Apps Show Lacks Shine

Apple’s iPhone 3.0 software developers conference kicked off with a few ho-hum application introductions.

The show, at Apple’s campus in Cupertino, Calif., concluded without a flashy one-more-thing, giving Apple’s stock nothing solid to build on.”

“Observers wanting more information about a rumored tablet device went home disappointed.”

Anssi Vankoji of Nokia (April 2009):

“We [at Nokia] don’t think the world is so simple that you just make one device for everybody. We know more about the consumers in the world than any other consumer goods company in the world because we have so many customers. We know they have different tastes and uses and so you have to offer a whole line.”

“I don’t think the world will unite on one platform. There are several that will succeed. Our platform, Symbian, is an open platform and will make a major impact in the industry.”

Trip Chowdhry of Global Equities Research (May, 2009):

“Investors should not think the upcoming version of iPhone 3 is going to be as successful as iPhone 2.0 because it will have solid competition from Palm Pre, developed by ex-Apple designer Jon Rubinstein.”

“Palm Pre has a superior operating system than iPhone. It runs on a better network — Sprint CDMA — versus iPhone which runs on GSM.”

Rob Enderle of the Enderle Analyst Group (June, 2009):

“The question is whether they will use [WWDC ’09] for product launches. It appears the answer is no since they are signaling that not only will Jobs not be there, neither will the new phones.”

Cory Bohon of The Unofficial Mac Weblog (June, 2009):

“3.0 FAIL”

“As a result, if you turn on the push notification service [on an original iPhone], you may be unable to receive voice calls.

Some iPhone owners might consider this a slap in the face from Apple ...

Push notifications could also end up being a flop for other iPhone users too. Due to the structure of the service, push notifications can get lost in transit, and pushes to the same app (possibly all pushes) kick older ones out of the push queue.”

Jon Stokes in Ars Technica (June, 2009):

“[I]f you’re like me and you felt that the iPhone, even in its post-MobileMe incarnation, never quite made sense as an Internet- and cloud-centric messaging device, then the Pre may be the answer to your prayers.”

Independent analyst Joe Wilcox (June 2009):

“What has Apple done truly innovative in [Jobs’s 6-month] absence? Not much”

“iPhone 3GS: More of the same, only better. It looks the same as iPhone 3G, and features like video and MMS are catchup. There’s no flash (for camera).

iPhone 3.0 OS: More of the same, only better. Sure, developers can now charge customers from within apps, but they’ve still got no Flash (from Adobe).”

“I don’t mean this ‘more of the same, only better’ list to be a criticism of the management team struggling along without [Jobs].”

“‘More of the same, only better,’ while good enough for most other companies, isn’t Apple. ... [T]hat dazzling ‘one more thing’ is missing. Apple needs it.”

David Coursey of PCWorld (August 2009):

“As Apple Rots, iPhone Users Revolt”

“Users are turning against the iPhone.”

“[Y]ou might find a more attractive option in a few months, especially if the iPhone’s downhill slide continues.”

“Do I really need to keep making the case that having Apple as the only vendor of iPhone apps is bad for customers? ... Apple doesn’t care about its customers.”

“Developers would flee the App Store given a chance. They should have that option.”

“The Apple monopolies must go.”

“iPhone developers should, right now, start supporting other platforms because it is in their best interest to do so. It appears likely that Android and Palm’s WebOS will support better applications than iPhone...”

“If Apple were wise it would offer an API that allows any smartphone to work with iTunes.”

“Maybe by the holidays ... Apple and AT&T will have been forced to change their customer-hostile ways.”

Jason Calacanis of Mahalo.com (August 2009):

“Years and years after Microsoft’s antitrust headlines, Apple is now the anti-competitive monster that Jobs rallied us against in the infamous 1984 commercial.”

“Steve Jobs is on the cusp of devolving from the visionary radical we all love to a sad, old hypocrite and control freak — a sellout of epic proportions.”

“I know many folks in the industry are saddened to see our LSD-taking, radical free-thinking and fight the power hero, turning to the Dark Side.”

“Of all the companies in the United States that could possibly be considered for anti-trust action, Apple is the lead candidate.”

“[W]hat Apple is doing is 100x worse than what Microsoft did.”

“Apple will face a user revolt in the coming years based upon Microsoft, Google and other yet-to-be-formed companies, undercutting their core markets with cheap, stable and open devices.”

“Think for a moment about what your reaction would be if Microsoft made the Zune the only MP3 player compatible with Windows. There would be 4chan riots, denial of service attacks and Digg’s front page would be plastered with pundit editorials claiming Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer were Borg.

Why, then, does Steve Jobs get a pass?”

Jon Fortt, Senior Writer For CNNMoney.com (August 2009):

“Innovation and expression on Apple’s iPhone platform are beginning to suffer, even as Apple insists that its restrictions are for our own good.”

Steve Ballmer of Microsoft (September 2009):

“PCs are not niche devices. Part of the reason I think they’re non-niche devices is: multiple people manufacture them, they all interoperate, they work together, etc. ... Phones are not niche.

The categories where I think a single player can control a large percentage of the volume are the smaller categories. ... But when you get to these categories that are 300 million, 500 million, a billion, a billion-five a year, the truth of the matter is you’re going to want multiple points of manufacture ... So I think you can have an Apple in the phone business, or a RIM, and they can do very well, but when 1.3 billion phones a year are all smart, the software that’s gonna be most popular in those phones is gonna be software that’s sold by somebody who doesn’t make their own phones.”

Ben Galbraith, formerly of Mozilla, now with Palm (September 2009):

“[M]y enthusiasm for this amazing new world [of pocket-sized computing devices] is tempered by some unfortunate decisions made by some of the players in this space. It seems that some view this revolution as a chance to seize power in downright Orwellian ways by constraining what we as developers can say, dictating what kinds of apps we can create, controlling how we distribute our apps, and placing all kinds of limits on what can do to our computing devices.

And so as my good friend and long-time collaborator Dion so eloquently explains over at his blog, he and I have taken an opportunity to work at Palm ...”

Marguerite Reardon of CNet (October 2009):

“Is the iPhone hurting AT&T’s brand?”

Chris Foresman of ars technica (October 2009):

“Flash 10.1 coming to just about every platform but iPhone”

“With Apple appearing to be the sole remaining holdout in the mobile space, it seems that it may be more and more difficult for Apple to ignore Flash ...”

Michael Arrington of TechCrunch (October 2009):

“Apple can’t win the fight [against Google’s Android] over the long term, but they sure are willing to say and do anything in the short term to stop the advance of Google.”

Ken Dulaney of Gartner (October 2009):

[Dulaney apparently predicts that Android will overtake iPhone in a few years — mainly because of the number of companies that are preparing to make Android phones — but is very careful not to provide a juicy quote that can be used in a page like this one.]

Robbie Bach of Microsoft (October 2009):

“The fascination with the absolute number [of apps in the iPhone App Store] is really nothing but a fascination.”

“Sure there are 85,000 apps in Apple App Store, how many of them are useful? If you do the math on which apps get used, there’s a relatively small number apps.”

Steve Ballmer of Microsoft (October 2009):

“Let’s face it, the Internet was designed for the PC. The Internet is not designed for the iPhone. That’s why they’ve got 75,000 applications — they’re all trying to make the Internet look decent on the iPhone.”

Joe Wilcox on Betanews (October 2009):

“iPhone cannot win the smartphone wars”

“Apple’s iPhone will lose the mobile device wars.”

“iPhone is to Android — and somewhat Symbian OS — handsets as Macintosh was to the DOS/Windows PC in the 1980s and 1990s. ... [B]y the mid 1990s, Windows PCs pushed down Mac market share. The iPhone is poised to track similarly. Gartner predicts that Android OS shipments will exceed iPhone OS by 2012 (see chart). I’m a believer.”

“[T]he number of applications is no surefire measure of iPhone’s or any other platform’s success.”

“Apple’s App Store/iPhone/iPod touch platform is narrower and shallower [than Windows or Google], despite the depth of applications, because the ecosystem depends on a closed, end-to-end technology platform. Apple controls everything.”

“[I]n the 1980s and 1990s ... Chairman Bill Gates took the brilliant approach of licensing to third parties.”

“Parallels between the past and present foreshadow iPhone’s future.”

“To reiterate: In the 2000s, like the 1980s, Apple successfully launched industry-changing platforms ... Like Macintosh, iPhone’s end-to-end licensing model is poised to limit the supporting ecosystem’s growth. Meanwhile, Google, Microsoft and Nokia license their mobile operating systems to third parties.”

“iPhone Against the World”

“Another ‘everyone else against Apple battle’ is coming, with Android looking to be the better OS around which an ecosystem grows and thrives.”

Erick Shonfeld of TechCrunch (October 2009):

“Google Should Make Apple Beg For Maps Navigation”

“Google is putting Apple on notice that it is no longer reserving its best apps for the iPhone.”

“Apple is in a terrible position here because the future of mobile apps are Web apps, and Google excels at making those.”

“The sad thing is that Apple has been here before — with Microsoft.”

Flora Graham of CNET UK (November 2009):

“The iPhone is the worst phone in the world

That’s right, we said it — and we’re not taking it back. The iPhone may be the greatest handheld surfing device ever to rock the mobile Web ... But as an actual call-making phone, it’s rubbish ...”

“Call quality on the iPhone is pathetic ...”

“The microphone is similarly craptastic ...”

“[T]he iPhone was the first to really flaunt its slim body while you watched the [battery] bars drop almost in front of your eyes.”

“The iPhone sucks — so what?

If the iPhone is inaudible, unconnected, on fire and out of battery, why is the thing so popular?”

David Samberg of Verizon (November 2009):

“Long lines forming outside [for a smartphone launch] are flashy. But it’s not really the goal. What we really want to see is this: a steady stream of people coming today [for the Droid launch] and for the next few weeks buying new phones.”

Chris Messina of Citizen Agency (November 2009):

“[W]hat is the App Store except a cleaved out and sanitized portion of the web? In fact, people accustomed to the freedom and ‘flow’ of the web go into anaphylactic shock when they realize that they must submit to the slings and arrows of the outrageous fortune of Steve Jobs when they want their iPhone app to show up in the Apple app store.”

“Thanks a lot, Steve.”

Ray Ozzie of Microsoft (November 2009):

“Yes, iPhone has a lot of momentum, unquestionably. But I think the phenomenon we’re in right now is the app phone. And if you look at the depth of apps that are on these phones, they’re not very deep. It’s not like Office or AutoCAD, where there are just thousands of man years that have gone into developing these apps. They’re relatively thin apps that are companions to some service.

All programs in the future will be written in a way that there is no single point of failure. There’s no one server that can die and take down the service.

And I think if you look at anyone who’s building an app phone — whether it’s Palm, Google with Android, RIM — ultimately, all the apps that people want will be on all the phones. They’re relatively straight porting efforts. I think people are imagining some kind of a barrier to entry, at least from an app perspective that I don’t believe is there.

The biggest barrier to entry is: is it a phone that people want to use? And is it a phone that carriers want to sell and people have to measure us based on what we produce. But I don’t believe that there’s an app barrier.”

Steve Ballmer of Microsoft (November 2009):

“I think we’re on the right strategy, which is to focus on the software that goes into phones, as opposed to building phones.”

Rob Enderle of the Enderle Group (December 2009):

“Apple has recently done more with the tablet format with the iPod Touch and iPhone then any other vendor but the jury is still largely out on this format with challenging devices from RIM, Palm, and Google often showcasing that keyboards are necessary.”

Jay Sullivan of Mozilla (December 2009):

“You have to create an iPhone app, an Android app, a Windows Mobile app...”

“As developers get more frustrated with quality assurance, the amount of handsets they have to buy, whether their security updates will get past the iPhone approval process... I think they’ll move to the web.”

“In the interim period, apps will be very successful. Over time, the web will win because it always does.”

Jonathan Rosenberg of Google (December 2009):

“At Google we believe that open systems win. They lead to more innovation, value, and freedom of choice for consumers, and a vibrant, profitable, and competitive ecosystem for businesses.”

“Complacency is the hallmark of any closed system. If you don’t have to work that hard to keep your customers, you won’t.

Open systems are just the opposite. They are competitive and far more dynamic. In an open system, a competitive advantage doesn’t derive from locking in customers, but rather from understanding the fast-moving system better than anyone else and using that knowledge to generate better, more innovative products.”

“Open systems have the potential to spawn industries. They harness the intellect of the general population and spur businesses to compete, innovate, and win based on the merits of their products...”

“[O]pen systems allow innovation at all levels — from the operating system to the application layer — not just at the top. This means that one company doesn’t have to depend on another’s benevolence to ship a product.”

“[P]lacing your bets on open requires the optimism, will, and means to think long term. Fortunately, at Google we have all three of these.”

“[W]e can take on big challenges that require large investments and lack an obvious, near-term pay-off.”

“Open will win.”

John Strand of Strand Consult (December 2009):

“How will psychologists describe the iPhone syndrome in the future?”

“When we examine the iPhone users’ arguments defending the iPhone, it reminds us of the famous Stockholm Syndrome — a term that was invented by psychologists after a hostage drama in Stockholm. Here hostages reacted to the psychological pressure they were experiencing, by defending the people that had held them hostage for 6 days.”

Henry Blodget of The Business Insider (January 2010):

“Hey, Apple, Wake Up — It’s Happening Again”

“A decade [after its 1980s successes] Apple was on its deathbed, a victim of a major strategic mistake that turned it into an also-ran.

What was that mistake?

The insistence on selling fully integrated hardware and software devices, instead of focusing on low-cost, widely distributed software.”

“Once again, Apple has seized the early lead, launching a revolutionary product that is taking the world by storm. ... In its short life, Google’s Android operating system has captivated developers and stolen mindshare from Apple...”

“The ‘Droid’ and Google Phone are getting rave reviews...”

“Apple, meanwhile, is coming under increasing scrutiny for being a domineering control freak hell-bent on secretly undermining its competitors...”

“[T]he movie is starting the same way. And so far, at least, Apple is showing no signs of doing anything differently.”

Jon Rubinstein of Palm (January 2010):

“I think we’ve done really well this past year”

“We don’t pay that much attention to Apple”

“I really don’t [worry about the iPhone]”

“I don’t have an iPhone. I’ve never even used one.”

“We don’t think what Apple did [making us stop having the Pre tell other USB devices that it’s an iPod from Apple] is good for their customers. But Apple’s going to do what Apple’s going to do.”

“I think we have a very large potential developer pool for the [Palm webOS].”

IDC’s 2009-2013 Mobile OS Analysis (January 2010):

[predicts that Android will overtake iPhone in about three years]

Dan Frommer of BusinessInsider.com (February 2010):

“Palm Disaster Shows That Apple Is Screwed Without Steve Jobs”

“Palm is basically Apple, Jr. And if a bunch of Apple geniuses can’t kick butt on their own at Palm, how are they going to kick butt without Steve at Apple?”

Don Tennant of ITBusinessEdge (February 2010):

“Why I Regret Buying an iPhone

I have an iPhone, but if I had it to do over again, I would never have bought one.”

“[A]t the time I bought it, I wasn’t fully aware of Apple’s blatant, unapologetic contempt for its employees, its suppliers, the media and its customers. Now that I’ve been educated, I’m sorry I ever bought one of Steve Jobs’ products.”

Peter Ha in Time (March 2010):

“[I]t’s a brand-new decade, and Microsoft is about to leapfrog Apple — and every other player in the cell-phone world — with the launch of Windows Phone 7 (WP7).”

“What sets Microsoft apart? For starters, every WP7 device, regardless of manufacturer, will have a dedicated search button that gives you one-click access to Bing ...”

“[A]fter spending some time with several core members of the Windows phone team, I walked away wondering if these vibrant people worked for the same company that gave us Vista.”

“[E]very other company, including Apple, will be racing to catch up with it [WP7].”

Peter Wayner of InfoWorld (March 2010):

“Android’s openness, flexibility, and Java foundation make it the best choice for many developers and the businesses that depend on them”

“Can Google Android phones compete with the Apple iPhone? ... The good news is that the platform is not only competitive but is often a better choice than the iPhone...”

“The differences become apparent if you want to do more than make a few phone calls and iFart around. ... While iPhone developers have found that one path to success is playing to our baser instincts (until Apple shuts them down), a number of Android applications are offering practical solutions that unlock the power of a phone that’s really a Unix machine you can slip into your pocket.

GScript, for instance, is an Android app that lets you write your own shell scripts and fire them off with a tap. Another useful app, Remote DB, lets you turn any SQL query into a button that searches the database remotely, then displays the results.”

Sebastian Anthony of DownloadSquad (March 2010):

“Microsoft set to destroy Apple in every games market”

“Apple, with its locked-down, isolated sandbox is in trouble. Do game developers have any reason to continue working on games for the iPhone or iPad now that Microsoft is offering so much more?”

“Can Apple really see themselves competing, with a minuscule desktop market share and 25% of the smartphone sector? Steve Jobs has announced Apple’s intent to move into mobile gaming, but can you really see developers siding with the iPhone when Windows Phone 7 is just around the corner?”

“Interoperability and cross-platform applications are really cool. You hear that, Apple?”

“Finally, like the gouging rusty handle of a spoon that seals the deal, is the crusty monstrosity of Apple’s iTunes App Store; dog-slow approvals and draconian rules on what constitutes acceptable content.”

“I think the iPhone has just lost any chance of its continued existence as a gaming platform.”

Mitch Kapor as quoted in The New York Times (March 2010):

“[Mobile phone developers favor the iPhone for now, but] they are all racing ahead to develop for Android too. [Apple’s] tight control helps in the beginning, but tends to choke things in the long term.”

Fred von Lohmann of Electronic Frontier Foundation (March 2010):

“If Apple wants to be a real leader, it should be fostering innovation and competition, rather than acting as a jealous and arbitrary feudal lord.”

Tim Bray of Google (March 2010):

“The iPhone vision of the mobile Internet’s future omits controversy, sex, and freedom, but includes strict limits on who can know what and who can say what. It’s a sterile Disney-fied walled garden surrounded by sharp-toothed lawyers. The people who create the apps serve at the landlord’s pleasure and fear his anger.”

Reggie Fils-Aime of Nintendo (April 2010):

“Clearly it doesn’t look like [Apple’s] platform is a viable profit platform for game development because so many of the games are free versus paid downloads. If our games represent a range between snacks of entertainment and full meals depending on the type of game, [Apple’s] aren’t even a mouthful, in terms of the gaming experience you get.”

Lee Brimelow of Adobe (April 2010):

“What they [Apple] are saying is that they won’t allow applications onto their marketplace solely because of what language was originally used to create them. This is a frightening move that has no rational defense other than wanting tyrannical control over developers and more importantly, wanting to use developers as pawns in their crusade against Adobe.”

“I am positive that there are a large number of Apple employees that strongly disagree with this latest move. Any real developer would not in good conscience be able to support this.”

“Personally I will not be giving Apple another cent of my money until there is a leadership change over there.”

“[T]his is equivalent to me walking into Macy’s to buy a new wallet and the salesperson spits in my face.”

“Go screw yourself Apple.”

John Battelle of Web 2.0 Summit (April 2010):

“Once upon a time, back before you [Apple] got real popular, you used to take part in the public square.”

“But over the past few years, things seem to have changed. You pulled out of MacWorld and began hosting your own strictly scripted events.”

“Despite the gorgeous products and services you’ve created, we worry that you’re headed down a road that may lead to your own demise.”

Neil McAllister of PCWorld (April 2010):

“Apple Locks iPhone Developers in Its Walled Garden”

“[iPhone d]evelopers can’t use [Flash] not for any technical reasons, but because Steve Jobs and his lawyers say they may not — period.”

“This unprecedented move has iPhone developers in an uproar, and the situation is only likely to get uglier. Rumor has it that Adobe plans to file a lawsuit against Apple in the next few weeks, alleging anticompetitive practices. But the real question is, given such a hostile environment, why on earth would developers stick with Apple’s platform?”

“The iPhone App Store is notorious for rejecting apps out of hand ...”

“[T]he new SDK license takes Apple’s heavy-handedness to a new level.”

“This is a particularly Orwellian twist ... Apple wants to be sure developers haven’t committed the thoughtcrime of using unsanctioned tools.”

“Fortunately, getting screwed and being led like cattle aren’t the only options for smartphone developers ... A growing number of developers are waking up to the idea that Apple may not have their best interests at heart.”

Tomi T. Ahonen in Communities Dominate Brands (April 2010):

“iPhone in Memoriam ...”

“[The iPhone’s] time of ascendancy has come to an end. The decline of the iPhone has started.”

“You read it right. I am writing the first history of the once-iconic iPhone ... [T]hat will become clear long before the year 2010 is gone ... And mark my words, the numbers are now very clear, Apple’s market share peak among smartphones, and among all handsets, on an annual basis, is being witnessed now. Yes its true, Apple cannot grow market share into 2011.”

“I am dead serious. I am now convinced that we have enough data to determine for a fact that Apple will not only see a dramatic decline in quarter-on-quarter sales in units of the iPhone this January-March quarter (which is the predictable pattern and no surprise) but that we will also see a decline in iPhone market share against at least HTC and Blackberry ...”

“I have a history of knowing Apple and its market when it relates to mobile ...”

Rosemary Hattersley reporting Eugene Kaspersky of Kaspersky Lab (April 2010):

“The death of the iPhone is being foretold ...”

“The iconic Apple iPhone will either not exist or occupy a very small niche satisfying the needs of committed Mac fans around five years from now, predicts Kaspersky.

The founder of Kaspersky Lab says that of the five main mobile platforms currently in existence, the only two guaranteed to last beyond the next five years are Android and Symbian.”

Andy Rubin of Google (April 2010):

“It’s a numbers game. When you have multiple OEM’s building multiple products in multiple product categories, it’s just a matter of time. I don’t know when it [Android outselling Apple/RIM] might be, but I’m confident it will happen.”

Tristan Louis in Business Insider (May 2010):

“Apple Is The New China”

“[A] Disneyworld version of computing is OK for most people. Most people love the magic kingdom but, for a portion of the population, Disneyworld is a place you visit, not one you live in.”

“For people who have lived in the mostly free-for-all environment of the computing industry (and its cousin, the anything-goes world of the Internet), the idea of a Disneyified world is as close as you will get to their concept of hell. And those people tend to be the ones that develop applications.”

Daniel Lyons of Newsweek (May 2010):

“Goodbye, Apple. I’m ditching my iPhone. Seriously, I’m gone. I don’t even care if Apple does manage to get off the awful AT&T network and strike a deal with Verizon.”

“The new version of Android — version 2.2, a.k.a. Froyo — blows the doors off the iPhone OS. It’s faster, for one thing. It also will support Flash, something Apple refuses to do, mostly out of spite.”

“Froyo also will let you buy songs over the air and download them directly to your phone.”

“[M]aybe [Apple’s] a market leader with no real competition and just got lazy.”

“Apple now is chasing Google.”

“Now [Android’s] blowing past Apple in terms of the technology it’s delivering.”

“Yes, Apple still has a larger installed base. ... I was shocked because it’s a familiar line, one that I’ve heard countless times in my 20-plus years covering technology. But I’ve only ever heard it from companies that are doomed and in total denial about it.

We’ve seen this movie before. In the 1980s, Apple jumped out to an early lead in personal computers, but then got selfish. Steve Jobs, a notorious control freak, just could not play well with others.”

“Jobs tries to dress up his selfishness as a kind of altruism. He says it’s all about creating a beautiful experience, that while he may be selling you an intentionally crippled device, he’s doing it for your own good. Well, bull. The truth is, this is about Apple wringing every last dime out of its ecosystem and leaving nothing on the table for anyone else.”

“As sick as I am of my iPhone’s dropped calls, I’m even more sick of Apple treating us all like a bunch of idiots, stonewalling and bullying and feeding us ridiculous explanations for the shortcomings of its products — expecting us to believe, basically, that its flaws are not flaws, but strengths.

Steve Jobs has created his own precious little walled garden. He’s looking more and more like Howard Hughes, holed up in his penthouse, making sure he doesn’t come in contact with any germs.

Now Google is saying, hey, nice garden, have fun sitting in it. By yourself.”

Brandt Dainow on iMediaConnection (May 2010):

“It seems inevitable that within 5-10 years the iPhone will hold around 5 percent of the smartphone market at best”

“Steve Job’s strategy for iPhone and iPad will inevitably lead Apple into becoming at best a marginal niche player, at worst an ex-business.”

“If [an] app works on Android, it makes no difference who built the hardware, the app will work on all Android phones.”

“Apple’s desire to control its marketplace has made it a poor choice for developers, even when it offers a large market.”

“[Jobs’s] iPhone strategy seems to have forgotten this painful lesson [of the mid-’90s Mac].”

“I first became involved with computers in the late 1970s. ... Steve Jobs continued to think in terms of the world he grew up in, a pre-PC world — each computer manufacturer producing its own operating system and strongly controlling developer access. Apple still continues to think this way, but the success of MS-DOS and Windows have shown that it is not sustainable.”

Matt Warman of Telegraph.co.uk (June 2010):

“[The iPhone] is a triumph of marketing over functionality. And it’s so ubiquitous it’s not even cool any more.”

“[W]hatever is announced at the forthcoming launch, there’s no point buying the iPhone 4G”

“It’s anti-technology ... When will [Apple] learn that it’s customers — supply and demand — that should dictate feature availability?”

“The iPhone, the phone that promised to put the web into everybody’s pockets, can’t even show you most of it, because it can’t handle Flash graphics.”

“If Apple announces multitasking next it will be an improvement — but there’ll be no apology for the way it’s treated customers in the past, and no guarantee it won’t behave similarly shoddily in the future.”

“Its battery life is terrible”

“Developing apps for it is costing you money: The special version of the BBC iPlayer, of Natwest Phone Banking, of Eon’s meter reader — developing all of these came out of money that could have been channelled away from a self-important minority and towards more generally useful ideas.”

“It comes with offensively bad headphones”

“It’s not very well designed”

“Those iPod docks are holding back better technologies: As every hotel increasingly thinks it should provide iPod docks, the momentum behind this technology is only growing. But if it wasn’t for the iPod and iPhone’s ubiquity, there’d be more wifi radios, more new technologies and a range of different options, competing and driving innovation.”

Neil McAllister in InfoWorld (June 2010):

“Often puzzling, always frustrating, the list of reasons why developers are denied access to Apple’s iPhone App Store grows ever longer”

“[T]he App Store’s requirements seem as vague and capricious as ever.”

“[I]f your app ... doesn’t look the way a good iPhone app should, expect a curt rejection note. Whatever your ideas about UI design, no matter how much research you’ve put into them, you’re wrong.”

“For [some developers], Apple’s strict control over everything about their apps — including their functionality, resource consumption, UI design, content, sales model, and time to market — is simply too much to bear. For those developers, listening to the tales of woe from iPhone developers as they keep coming in, the grass on the other side of the fence must look greener every day.”

ABI Research, as quoted in Electronista (June 2010):

“Research shows mobile app stores near height

Mobile app stores could peak in as little as two years, ABI Research warned today. It expects the download rate to peak by 2012 or 2013 and to slowly decline from then onwards. Downloads could still be popular with 1.2 billion apps downloaded in 2015, but the decline would be quick enough that companies may not want to depend heavily on apps in the long term.”

Dennis Kneale on the Daily Beast (June 2010):

“Google Trounces the iPhone”

“Apple’s legions of devotees should brace their hipster selves for an inevitable fall from grace.”

“One year from now, the iPhone will lose its perch as the world’s most important mobile platform, toppled by Android, the ‘open,’ all-comers-welcome design from Apple’s avowed enemy, Google.”

“[T]he Droid X ... does some cool things iPhone can’t, such as shooting high-def video ...”

“At Apple, control is paramount, the rules are rigid and the design comes down to the sole purview of one man: an omnipotent control freak born in a Teutonic black turtleneck. No wonder they call the iPhone ‘proprietary.’ Google, its founders, and its CEO, Eric Schmidt, stand for the cause of open design. Thousands of developers from hundreds of shops and dozens of device makers are free to tinker with Android all they want.”

“In less than a year, Android has lured over two dozen makers to join its loosey-goosey confederacy, and now they make 50 rival handsets. Apple goes it alone and makes, basically, one model. Android’s inexorable advance is only a matter of time.”

“[Apple’s] obsession with proprietary control all but killed Apple’s Macintosh computer line in the 1990s as hundreds of companies coalesced around the rise of ‘Wintel’ ... Apple now is in danger of seeing that scenario repeated in the rise of the Androids. The company could fare just fine with its own slice of the market, sequestered from the broader and more open market for Android devices. But no longer would the entire mobile world hang on Apple’s every move, because it just won’t matter anymore.”

Liu Chuanzhi, founder and CEO of Lenovo (July 2010):

“We are lucky that Steve Jobs has such a bad temper and doesn’t care about China. If Apple were to spend the same effort on the Chinese consumer as we do, we would be in trouble.”

Kevin Turner of Microsoft (July 2010):

It looks like the iPhone 4 might be [Apple’s] Vista, and I’m okay with that. We’re back in the game [at Microsoft], and this game is not over.

Mike Lazaridis and Jim Balsillie of RIM (July 2010):

“Apple’s attempt to draw RIM into Apple’s self-made [iPhone 4 antenna] debacle is unacceptable. Apple’s claims about RIM products appear to be deliberate attempts to distort the public’s understanding of an antenna design issue and to deflect attention from Apple’s difficult situation.”

Jeff Bertolucci in PC World (July 2010):

“Apple Must Kill The iPhone 4 — The Sooner The Better”

“Image is everything. And that’s why Apple must terminate the iPhone 4 as quickly as possible.”

“The iPhone 4 is now tainted in the consumer’s eyes. It’s no longer a triumph of form and function, but rather a crippled device ...”

“We could debate the merits of the iPhone 4’s antenna design all day, but that’s beside the point. Perception is reality here, and the public now views Apple’s latest offering as The Phone That Drops Calls.”

“[T]he iPhone 4 has lost its cachet. It’s no longer the coolest gadget in town.”

“Yikes. It’s enough to force a mass migration to Motorola’s new and very popular Droid X.”

Dan Lyons of Newsweek (July 2010):

“I wonder if panic has started to set in at Apple yet. If not, it should.”

“Earlier this week Consumer Reports declared it could not recommend the phone ...”

“This is classic Apple behavior. ... Jobs just reinforced the image of Apple as a company that is in deep denial and unable to admit a mistake ...”

“Apple would like to believe that it can just sweep the problem under the rug. But I’m not so sure.”

“Apple’s rivals will have a field day with this.”

Fred Wilson of Union Square Ventures as reported by Liz Gannes on Bloomberg Businesweek (July 2010):

“Wilson said the biggest worry for his portfolio companies, which include Foursquare and Twitter, is not actually Facebook, as many would assume. It’s Apple. Apple is ‘evil,’ Wilson said. Why? ‘They believe they know what is best for you and me. And I think that is evil.’”

John Naughton in The Guardian (July 2010):

“If Apple wants to be a major player it needs to start behaving like one”

Jim Zemlin of the Linux Foundation (August 2010):

“Three or four years from now, Linux is not going to be just an operating system you use on your laptop or your phone. It’s going to become the fabric of computing.”

“We don’t have to evangelize Linux as much anymore. Nobody needs to be convinced. That battle is over.”

“I think there will be a healthy industry rebalancing [in the mobile app market]. It’s unlikely in my mind that Apple will end up with the same de facto API standard that Microsoft achieved in the 1980s and ’90s.”

“Other companies are launching their own app stores now. If you want to be on par with the Apple App Store, it’s totally within reach.”

“There are very few apps you need to buy, so the important thing is to get the good free apps ported to your platform. I think it’s an advantage Apple has right now, but it won’t be a huge competitive advantage when the next cool device comes along and everyone wants to port to it.”

“[The multi-platform app warehouse] model will get ironed out over the next couple of years. And it’s better than the alternative, which is iTunes. But nobody’s going to give Apple 30 percent of gross revenue forever. Even services are all through Apple. That’s so absurd, and just unsustainable.

And of course, all that warehouse stuff will be Linux.”

“There will be many, many more tablet devices, and the hot apps will be on those tablets, I guarantee it.”

Paul Venezia’s “The Deep End” on InfoWorld (August 2010):

“Smartphone wars: The PC wars all over again

How RIM, Apple, Google, and Microsoft are re-enacting the desktop wars of the ’80s and ’90s

The current smartphone playing field looks amazingly familiar. In fact, I think I’ve seen this movie before.

The names have changed, but the roles remain the same.”

“Apple, meanwhile, is in the same position it was in way back then.”

“Google holds Microsoft’s place in this comparison ...”

“[I]t’s clear that Jobs absolutely values quality over quantity and always has.”

Avram Piltch on The Tech Night Owl Live With Gene Steinberg (September 2010):

“I don’t think the government is going to push Apple around in any way, unfortunately — because what Apple’s been doing in a lot of cases is more egregious than what Microsoft was accused of doing in the late ’90s, in terms of anti-competitive practices. You know, locking people out of their App Store.”

“It’s just much easier to develop for Android than it is for iPhone.”

“Why does Apple have to force you to not only meet their stringent guidelines, but you can’t use Windows [to develop iPhone and iPad apps]? You literally have to buy a Mac in order to develop for iPhone? ... Hopefully, that will change.”

Consumer Reports as reported by Josh Ong in AppleInsider (September 2010):

“Consumer Reports condemns end of iPhone 4 free case program

Consumer Reports responded negatively to Apple’s discontinuation of the free iPhone 4 case program, refusing to recommend the iPhone 4.”

“Apple’s decision to discontinue the iPhone 4 free case program was seen as ‘less consumer-friendly.’

‘Putting the onus on any owners of a product to obtain a remedy to a design flaw is not acceptable to us,’ wrote Consumer Reports.

Paul Thurrott, winsupersite.com (September 2010):

“Droid Attack Spells Doom for iPhone”

“Aside from one killer mistake, something that would be oh so easy to fix, this phone is hands-down superior to anything designed in Cupertino.”

“Android and the DROID X are, warts and all, already neck and neck with the iPhone 4. It’s scary to think how one-sided this would be if Google just put a handful of UI experts on the [Android app] marketplace. Game over, Apple. Game over.”

Michael Arrington of TechCrunch (September 2010):

“I Forgot How Bad The iPhone Is”

“I’m not so sure that long time iPhone users even remember what it’s like to have a phone call that doesn’t drop at the end.”

“This thing is eye candy but it’s a very flawed phone. I’ll be going back to the Nexus One.”

Alan Panezic of RIM (September 2010):

“We aren’t focusing on, say, hitting the 50,000 app mark [in our App World that now has over 10,000 apps].”

“For us, apps are all about adding real value to the end-user’s life and creating revenue for developers. We don’t need 200 fart apps in App World.”

“With the focus on SuperApps, we’re trying to create a sustainable app ecosystem.”

Brian X. Chen on ars technica (November 2010):

“Windows Phone 7 already doomed? Don’t let early sales fool you”

“Despite entering a crowded market, Microsoft’s brand-new Windows Phone operating system seems off to a healthy start. Nonetheless, the estimates aren’t impressing cynical tech journalists.”

“If you consider that Windows Phone is entering a market where everyone and their mother already seems to be cradling an iPhone or an Android phone, a 40,000 day-one estimate isn’t bad.”

“This all makes the pile ‘doom and gloom’ stories about Windows Phone 7 look silly (as was the case with the ‘iPhone is doomed’ stories.) I personally think Windows Phone 7 is going to be huge in two years ...”

Paul Grim on MobileBeat (November 2010):

“For the better part of 20 years, Mac lovers fumed in frustration as Apple languished in sub-5% PC market share territory. Wintel dominated. Big, ugly, buggy, clunky, and everywhere. It seemed as if graphic designers were the only people stubbornly refusing to admit defeat and join the rest of the planet in using Windows.”

“And then the iPod begat the iPhone [...] Apple had irreversibly changed the wireless industry, for the better.”

“But Android was getting ready to take over.”

“Once it was clear that Android was building a critical mass, handset OEMs saw their chance to beat Apple and stay relevant.”

“[W]ill Apple ever have 20 versions of the iPhone? 50? Of course not. Will it ever license the platform to OEMs? Are you kidding me? This is why Android will completely dominate the wireless world.”

“[I]f you had to prioritize your focus, Android in the long run is the right place to be. Apple’s distribution platform is much better currently, but the numbers game is more important.”

Jim Balsillie of RIM (November 2010):

“We believe that you can bring the mobile to the Web but you don’t need to go through some kind of control point of an SDK, and that’s the core part of our message.”

Francisco Jeronimo of IDC (November 2010):

“The iPhone was last year’s hot device and now people are looking for something different.”

Katherine Noyes in PCWorld (November 2010):

“Apple Is Getting Desperate in the Mobile Arena”

“Apple is notorious for the iron-fisted control it exerts over the apps in its App Store ...”

“[I]t’s clear Apple is more worried than ever about Android’s growing popularity. Of course, that fear is understandable. ... [The rise of Android is] terrifying, if you’re on the iPhone team.”

“Settling into a Niche”

“I believe Apple’s iPhone is rapidly becoming a niche device.”

“Apple may always have its share of fans among consumers who don’t mind living in its ‘walled garden,’ but there’s no way it can compete in the market as a whole with the diverse, compelling and powerful platform that is Android.”

Paul Thurrott on Windows Phone Secrets (November 2010):

“[T]hese early [Windows Phone 7 sales] reports don’t provide any credible figures. But even if sales are as bad as all get-out, you’re forgetting one thing: It almost doesn’t matter., because Microsoft is in this for the long haul. They’re going to continue pushing this system ahead, and pushing it to developers and users.”

Kieran Connell of Microsoft (December 2010):

“I think there are too many people with too much money invested to let Apple win in terms of flooding the entire market. You’d better believe Microsoft is very serious about Windows Phone 7, and protecting their part of the business.”

Louis Gray, Silicon Valley tech blogger (December 2010):

“The iPhone Fanboys Can’t Handle the Truth On Android”

“The truth is that Android can go feature by feature against iPhone now. iPhone is not yards ahead of the competition, and while there may be some clear places where Apple is ahead, it comes down to an individual’s preference now, including their choice to have a keyboard (which Apple seems not interested in doing), their choice of carriers (still limited here, even if Verizon comes to the party), or many other factors.”

Seth Weintraub in Fortune (December 2010):

“2011 will be the year Android explodes”

“[I]f things play out the way Rubin, Google, Broadcom and HTC hope, even [tripling sales] may wind up being a conservative estimate for Android growth. What’s most interesting is that unless Apple has a plan to keep up, their iPhone, once one of the only usable smartphone games in town, may wind up back where most Apple products are slotted — at the top of the market, affordable only to those willing and able to pay a premium for Steve Jobs’ aesthetic sensibilities.”

Steve Ballmer of Microsoft (January 2011):

“When people see it [WP7], they fall in love with [it]. The result is very high enthusiasm. 9 out of 10 customers at AT&T say they recommend the product to others. We’re investing aggressively in the future.”

“Whatever device you use... Windows will be there.”

“Windows PCs will continue to adapt and evolve. Windows will be everywhere on every device without compromise.”

Katherine Noyes in PCWorld (January 2011):

“Why Apple’s iPhone Will ‘Drown in a Sea of Androids’”

“[U]nless Apple starts licensing the iPhone to other handset makers, the platform could get lost amid the many Android competitors.”

“Though [the iPhone has] enjoyed a first mover advantage in the smartphone arena, the Android floodgates are now open, and promise to make the iPhone a niche device for Apple enthusiasts.”

“The Power of Choice”

“The iPhone will clearly out-earn any single Android device in the short term, but Android’s diversity will win out in the long run, relegating the iPhone to niche status.”

“Apple imposes too many restrictions in its condescending approach, and it offers too few choices to have the broad appeal it needs to dominate in the long run ...”

“Apple will always have a contingent of fanatics that support its every move. But with its current strategy, it can’t compete with the diverse and powerful platform that is Android.”

Joe Wilcox on betanews (January 2011):

“Why Verizon won’t let Apple announce iPhone”

“Verizon isn’t AT&T. The United States’ largest cellular carrier isn’t accustomed to taking crap from handset manufacturers. Verizon controls everything on its network and is quick to customize handsets with its software and services. AT&T is different, or was when Apple launched the original iPhone in June 2007. AT&T made lots of concessions to get iPhone, such as granting Apple control over the software and updates.”

“Perhaps 18 months ago, Verizon would have ceded more to Apple.”

“Verizon takes No Crap from Suppliers”

“iPhone is stalling against the Android onslaught, which is everywhere. That makes Apple’s need for the nation’s larget carrier hugely important, perhaps more so than Verizon’s need for iPhone.”

“Verizon CEO Ivan Seidenberg is a formidable figure in American business.”

“No one should expect Verizon to take a backseat to Apple, the way AT&T has. ... Apple is just another phone supplier, albeit a hugely successful one.”

Jimmy Wales of Wikipedia as reported by John Lister on Tech.Blorge (January 2011):

“[S]et-ups such as the iTunes App Store can act as a ‘chokepoint that is very dangerous.’ He said such it was time to ask if the model was ‘a threat to a diverse and open ecosystem’ and made the argument that ‘we own [a] device, and we should control it.’”

Dan Lyons in Newsweek (January 2011):

“The Verizon iPhone Is Too Late

Apple’s phone would have snuffed out the Android a year ago, but now Google’s device has become an unstoppable juggernaut.”

“[I]f this event had taken place a year ago, I would have said Android was in trouble. ... But a lot has changed in the past year.”

“Android still has one huge advantage over the iPhone — diversity. ... With the iPhone you can have whatever Steve Jobs says you can have.”

“So who cares that now Apple will sell its phone on Verizon? For me, it’s too late.”

“Apple’s big weakness is its control-freak nature and insistence that there is only one way to make a smart phone. No matter how many carriers sign on to carry the iPhone, in the long run, Apple has again set itself up to be a niche player in smartphones, just as it is in PCs.”

Fred Wilson of Union Square Ventures (January 2011):

“Android is a global phenomenon. The big deal is, Android is free software, and handsets that can run it are getting super-cheap. So we are going to see a massive shift from ‘dumb phones’ to ‘smart phones’ around the world this year, and iPhone will not be the big beneficiary of that trend.”

eMarketer (January 2011):

“Google’s mobile OS will be on top [of the US smartphone market] by year-end 2012”

“eMarketer estimates that after exploding from just 6% of the US smartphone market in 2009 to 24% in 2010, Android will continue to gain share through 2012, when 31% of all smartphone users will own a device running the Google OS. That same year Apple’s share of the market will hold steady at 30%, up only slightly from 2009.”

Eric S. Raymond, “Armed and Dangerous” (January 2011):

“Far from scoring a coup, Verizon may have just bought the biggest bag of substanceless hype and wind Steve Jobs has ever peddled while AT&T snickers behind its hand. The iPhone brand is in worse shape than I thought was even possible. And the implications of that are huge.

First: We can expect Verizon’s iPhone sales to be anemic.”

“Second: Anybody betting their dollars or reputation that Apple’s ‘superior user experience’ would guarantee it perpetually increasing market share just took it on the chin, hard.”

“Third: The iPhone is in deep trouble.”

Reggie Fils-Aime of Nintendo (February 2011):

“[Cheap mobile games are] disposable from a consumer standpoint.”

“Angry Birds is a great piece of experience, but that is one compared to thousands of other pieces of content that for one or two dollars I think create a mentality for the consumer that a piece of gaming content should only be $2.”

“[I] think some of those games are actually overpriced at $1 or $2, but that’s a different story.”

Richard Stallman of the Free Software Foundation (March 2011):

“I don’t have a cell phone. I won’t carry a cell phone. It’s Stalin’s dream. Cell phones are tools of Big Brother.”

“[M]ost people are taught to think about software purely as a matter of price and performance, not whether it respects your freedom. People who make decisions on those values will not make any sacrifice of convenience to get free software, whereas I am willing to work for years and years and years to have no proprietary software in my computer.”

IDC Analyze the Future (March 2011):

[forecasts that over the next four years, iOS market share will slightly decline while WP7 will nearly quadruple, putting WP7 ahead of iOS by over 35%]

Henry Blodget on Business Insider (April 2011):

“Android Is Destroying Everyone ... iPhone Dead In Water”

“Apple fans should be scared to death about [Android’s gains]. Apple is fighting a very similar war to the one it fought — and lost — in the 1990s. It is trying to build the best integrated products, hardware and software, and maintain complete control over the ecosystem around them. This end-to-end control makes it easier for Apple to build products that are “better,” but it makes it much harder for the company to compete against a software platform that is standard across many hardware manufacturers (Windows in the 1990s, Android now).”

“[T]hese Android gains should scare the bejeezus out of Apple bulls — and Apple itself.”

Eric Raymond’s Armed and Dangerous (April 2011):

“The only plausible comeback scenario for the iPhone after Android blew past it in November 2010 was that there was huge demand for the iPhone being pent up by customers’ inability to use it off AT&T’s network.”

“This fantasy is now dead. ... And the news from outside the U.S., where Apple’s market share has been nosediving over the last year, is worse.”

“Apple’s smartphone market share has been essentially flat for two quarters. That’s a very bad sign in a market where returns tend to increase with scale and both gains and losses in share are self-amplifying. Apple is balancing on a knife edge. I think we’re looking at the end stage of a successful technology disruption on the classic pattern. The question is no longer whether Android can be stopped, but when Apple’s market share will fall off a cliff. I think that could easily happen as soon as the next 90 days; one of the patterns in technology disruptions is that collapse often follows the victim’s best quarter ever.”

Daniel Ionescu on PCWorld (May 2011):

“A PCWorld analysis of the top apps on competing smartphone app stores reveals that the majority of the iPhone’s most popular apps are also available on Android, Windows Phone 7, Palm, RIM BlackBerry, and Nokia phones. This dispels the smartphone buyers’ myth that claims: ‘The bigger the app store, the better the phone.’”

Dan Frommer in Business Insider (May 2011):

“Here’s Apple’s Weak Non-Answer To Why Android Won’t Torch The iPhone Like Windows Did To The Mac”

“Why isn’t Android a Windows repeat? Why won’t it crush your growth, especially in the U.S.? Tim Cook responded with a big, fat non-answer. Basically, he just said a bunch of things that could be summarized by: Apple is awesome! And Android is crap!”

Stephen Elop of Nokia (June 2011):

“Apple in 2007 introduced a high water mark in terms of saying, ‘This is what users expect...[’] But Apple did this in a very Apple way. It was closed.”

“Apple created Android, or at least it created the conditions necessary to create Android. People decided they could not play in the Apple way, and they had to do something else. Then Google stepped in there and created Android... and others jumped on the Android train.”

Elias Samuel on International Business Times (July 2011):

“Motorola Droid Bionic Dwarfs iPhone 5 in Every Aspect”

“Whatever may be the outcome of specifications of these two smartphones, Motorola Droid Bionic seems to have clearly dwarfed the iPhone 5.”

Timothy B. Lee on Forbes (August 2011):

“Why Google is Winning the Smartphone Wars”

“[Google] has focused on making Android work gracefully with as much of the ‘real world’ as possible. When Apple was building its own hardware, Google was cutting deals with numerous hardware manufacturers.”

“This explains why iOS has been losing ground to Android even though most people agree that the iPhone is the best single smartphone on the market. There are tens of millions of people who care most about the narrow end of the funnel. They want the best user interface, and are willing to make compromises on other fronts to get it. Most of these customers will opt for an iPhone. But there are hundreds of millions of customers who care more about some other factor.”

“And things will only get more challenging for Apple as the smartphone market globalizes. The overwhelming majority of potential smartphone customers are outside of the United States. Android’s relatively liberal licensing model will make it much easier for overseas partners to customize Google’s software to the needs of local markets, while Apple’s ‘my way or the highway’ licensing model rubs potential partners the wrong way.”

Staff Reporter on International Business Times (September 2011):

“Droid Bionic Release Confirmed, Will iPhone 5 Still be Waited For?”

Peter Bright On ars technica (September 2011):

“Ultrabook: Intel’s $300 million plan to beat Apple at its own game

My desktop isn’t the only computer I plan to replace in the next few months. I need a new laptop too, and my goal is simple: to find a 13" MacBook Air that isn’t made by Apple.”

Martin Fichter of HTC (September 2011):

“I brought my daughter back to college — she’s down in Portland at Reed — and I talked to a few of the kids on her floor. And none of them has an iPhone because they told me: ‘My dad has an iPhone.’ There’s an interesting thing that’s going on in the market. The iPhone becomes a little less cool than it was.”

Cole Brodman of T-Mobile (September 2011):

“We’re very confident that these Android smartphones rival or beat any smartphone out there in terms of functionality, speed, overall experience and features — including the iPhone. Android has evolved quickly from geek to chic. In many ways, Android is rivaling and even outpacing the iPhone ...”

Zach Epstein on BGR (October 2011):

“Apple’s fall from grace”

“On Tuesday when Apple unveiled its brand new iPhone 4S, the fifth iteration of Apple’s revolutionary smartphone, things felt different. ... People seemed, in a way, bored. Reactions from those who spent time with the device at Apple’s press conference were positive, of course, but it didn’t feel the same.”

Louis Bedigian in Forbes (October 2011):

“If you thought Facebook press conferences were bad, just wait till you hear what Apple did this afternoon. Nothing!”

“[The iPhone 4S is a] remarkably sucky, shoddy, sloppy, slapped together disaster of a phone ...”

“I give Apple a great big ‘LOL’ for creating another fine example of why the company’s video game presentations are always a joke. Come on, Apple! When are you going to wake up and design a real game machine that plays real games?”

Paul Thurrott of Paul Thurrott’s Supersite For Windows (October 2011):

“There’s a long-running joke that Apple’s fans would buy anything the company sold, no matter the quality. But this past weekend, the joke became reality when the Cupertino consumer electronics giant sold 4 million units of a smartphone, the iPhone 4S, that even its most charitable supporters have described as an evolutionary update over its predecessor.”

“Apple’s fans are more interested in spending money than they are with facts. ... That the lackluster iPhone 4S can sell so well in a market dominated by more capable Android handsets (not to mention Windows Phones) only bolsters that notion.”

Mike Elgan on Datamation (October 2011):

“[T]he iPhone 4s kind of sucks. There. I said it.”

“I don’t have much faith in Apple to get it right for the upcoming iPhone 5, either. The iPhone 4s has shaken my confidence in Apple’s legendary ability to bang out hit after hit.”

“The iPhone 4s is the first stumble by Apple since the company launched the original iPhone in 2007.”

“The iPhone 4s feels like they chose to release an unfinished product in order to satisfy Wall Street ...”

Joe Wilcox on Betanews (November 2011):

“Why can’t Apple get iPhone’s design right?”

“For a company praised for such great design, Apple sure seems troubled getting out an iPhone that works right.”

“Maybe Apple simply is out of its depth.”

“A company with deeper-engineering function culture might not have so blundered as Apple did ...”

“iPhone 4S carries on the sad tradition of its predecessor ...”

Consumer Reports on the iPhone 4S (November 2011):

“These pluses were not enough, however, to allow the iPhone 4S to outscore the best new Android-based phones in our Ratings. Those top scorers included the Samsung Galaxy S II phones, the Motorola Droid Bionic, and several other phones that boast larger displays than the iPhone 4S and run on faster 4G networks.”

Dan Frommer on SplatF (November 2011):

“Why Apple’s iPhone market share actually matters”

“While Google Android’s share of the smartphone market soars, Apple’s is drooping.”

“[E]ven the best iPhone Christmas probably won’t even come close to Android’s quarter. And even if you broaden your scope to ‘years’ and not ‘quarters’, it’s safe to say that Google is winning the market share race, and this is not good news for Apple.”

“Why? Because this isn’t just about selling devices and making a few hundred bucks a pop. It’s about building the dominant mobile platform for the next several decades.

Eric Schmidt of Google (December 2011):

“Android is ahead of the iPhone now.”

“Android was founded before the iPhone was.”

“[If you’re saying iOS apps are beating Android versions to market,] my prediction is that six months from now you’ll say the opposite.”

“Ultimately, application vendors are driven by volume, and volume is favored by the open approach Google is taking. There are so many manufacturers working so hard to distribute Android phones globally that whether you like [Android 4.0] or not ... you will want to develop for that platform, and perhaps even first.”

Niels Munksgaard of Nokia (December 2011):

“What we see is that youth are pretty much fed up with iPhones. Everyone has the iPhone.”

Taylor Hatmaker on Tecca (December 2011):

“A Year In Fail: The 6 biggest technology flops of 2011”

3. iPhone 4S

While it’s no flop when it comes to sales figures, the iPhone 4S remains one of 2011’s biggest consumer letdowns. ... [I]t’s tough to not be disappointed by the iconic company’s most recent handset. Apple’s newest iteration of the iPhone is certainly nothing to sneeze at — it’s still one of the fastest, best-looking smartphones on the block — but it’s no iPhone 5.”

Charlie Kindel on cek.log (December 2011):

“Apple has been successful (at least in terms of generating revenue) in this space by cutting the device manufacturer out. They have then used that fact to force the carriers into being even more of a fat dumb pipe. ... [M]y belief is over time this strategy will start to deteriorate for Apple.”

Don Reisinger in eWEEK (December 2011):

“Forget about Apple

Microsoft should totally ignore Apple. The iPhone maker might be selling boatloads of smartphones, but its overall OS market share is on the decline. Plus, it controls both software and hardware. Google is the company Microsoft must worry about. Android has the same basic business plan as Windows Phone 7, and it’s targeting the same vendors. Forget about Apple, Microsoft. It’s just distracting you from the real threat.”

Brian Deagon in Investor’s Business Daily (December 2011):

“Apple, Google Seen Stumbling In 2012”

“Apple will lose its cool factor.”

“The iPhone is boxy, flat and feeling stale. The Samsung Galaxy smartphone seems cooler. With Google’s Android platform now the fastest-growing mobile OS, Apple’s software advantage will diminish. Smartphones and tablets will become commodity items and Apple will be eaten by the collective Android gang. Apple’s next big hope is the TV market, a tough nut to crack and where Samsung is king.”

iSuppli (January 2012):

[predicts that Windows Phone will surpass iPhone in market share by 2015]

Paul Thurrott on Paul Thurrott’s Supersite For Windows (February 2012):

“Yes, Android Still Beat Apple Handily in the Q4 Smartphone Market

Anyone who thought stronger-than-logical sales of the iPhone 4S in the previous quarter were going to make a difference short-term needs to breathe deeply for a few seconds. Because it didn’t happen.”

prev     next

 

Hear, hear

prev     next

Favorite links

Starbucks

Apple

RoughlyDrafted

Daring Fireball

Joel on Software

Grupo Fantasma

Macalope

Red Meat

Despair, Inc.

The J. Peterman Company

Zombie Survival Guide plus Dawn of the Dead

Charlie Superfly Check “The First Time” to hear what she actually sang in the competition. HowardTV ripped it out and spliced in utter crap they had her sing later.

Real Solution #9 (Mambo Mania Mix) over stock nuke tests.

Ernie & Bert In Casino

Great Explanation of Star Wars

Best Superbowl 43 Commercial

Kirk & Spock get Closer

American football explained.

Piada. Yum. Like, Chipotle meets Italian.

TV: Survivor; Justified; Heavy; The Chicago Code; Cash Cab; Wipeout

God’s kitchen

My vote for best commercial ever.

Entire site as a zip file — last updated 2012.01.05

My books

Now available on the iBookstore!

   

Previous articles

Microsoft’s Dim Prospects

Humanity — Just Barely

Hanke-Henry Calendar Won’t Be Adopted

Collatz Conjecture Analysis (But No Proof; Sorry)

Rock-Solid App Stability

Microsoft’s Uncreative Character

Microsoft’s Alternate Reality Bubble

Microsoft’s Three Ruts

Society’s Fascination With Mass Murder

PlaysForSure and Wikipedia — Revisionism At Its Finest

Procrastination

Patent Reform?

How Many Licks

Microsoft’s Incredible Run

Voting Socialist

Darwin Saves

Collatz Conjecture ... Not Yet

The Size of Things In the Universe

The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy That Wasn’t

Fun

Nobody Was In Love With Windows

Apples To Apples — How Anti-Apple Pundits Shoot Themselves In the Foot

No Holds Barred

Betting Against Humanity

Apple’s Premium Features Are Free

Why So Many Computer Guys Hate Apple

3D TV With No Glasses and No Parallax/Focus Issues

Waves With Particle-Like Properties

Gridlock Is Just Fine

Sex Is A Fantasy

Major Player

Why the iPad Wannabes Will Definitely Flop

Predators and Parasites

Prison Is For Lotto Losers

The False Dichotomy

Wait and See — Windows-vs-Mac Will Repeat Itself

Dishonesty For the Greater Good

Barr Part 2

Enough Information

Zune Is For Apple Haters

Good Open, Bad Open

Beach Bodies — Who’s Really Shallow?

Upgrade? Maybe Not

Eliminating the Impossible

Selfish Desires

Farewell, Pirate Cachet

The Two Risk-Takers

Number of Companies — the Idiocy That Never Dies

Holding On To the Solution

Apple Religion

Long-Term Planning

What You Have To Give Up

The End of Elitism

Good and Evil

Life

How Religion Distorts Science

Laziness and Creativity

Sideloading and the Supersized-Mastodon-In-the-Room That Snell Doesn’t See

Long-Term Self-Delusion

App Store Success Won’t Translate To Books, Movies, and Shows

Silly iPad Spoilsports

I Disagree

Five Rational Counterarguments

Majority Report

Simply Unjust

Zooman Science

Reaganomics — Like A Diet — Works

Free R&D?

Apple’s On the Right Track

Mountains of Evidence

What We Do

Hope Conquers All

Humans Are Special — Just Not That Special

Life = Survival of the Fittest

Excuse Me, We’re Going To Build On Your Property

No Trademark iWorries

Knowing

Twisted Excuses

The Fall of Google

Real Painters

The Meaning of Kicking Ass

How To Really Stop Casual Movie Disc Ripping

The Solitary Path of the High-Talent Programmer

Fixing, Not Preaching

Why Blackmail Is Still Illegal

Designers Cannot Do Anything Imaginable

Wise Dr. Drew

Rats In A Too-Small Cage

Coming To Reason

Everything Isn’t Moving To the Web

Pragmatics, Not Rights

Grey Zone

Methodologically Dogmatic

The Purpose of Language

The Punishment Defines the Crime

Two Many Cooks

Pragmatism

One Last Splurge

Making Money

What Heaven and Hell Are Really About

America — The Last Suburb

Hoarding

What the Cloud Isn’t For

Diminishing Returns

What You’re Seeing

What My Life Needs To Be

Taking An Early Retirement

Office Buildings

A, B, C, D, Pointless Relativity

Stephen Meyer and Michael Medved — Where Is ID Going?

If You Didn’t Vote — Complain Away

iPhone Party-Poopers Redux

What Free Will Is Really About

Spectacularly Well

Pointless Wrappers

PTED — The P Is Silent

Out of Sync

Stupid Stickers

Security Through Normalcy

The Case For Corporate Bonuses

Movie Copyrights Are Forever

Permitted By Whom?

Quantum Cognition and Other Hogwash

The Problem With Message Theory

Bell’s Boring Inequality and the Insanity of the Gaps

Paying the Rent At the 6 Park Avenue Apartments

Primary + Reviewer — An Alternative IT Plan For Corporations

Yes Yes Yes

Feelings

Hey Hey Whine Whine

Microsoft About Microsoft Visual Microsoft Studio Microsoft

Hidden Purple Tiger

Forest Fair Mall and the Second Lamborghini

Intelligent Design — The Straight Dope

Maxwell’s Demon — Two Real-World Examples

Zealots

Entitlement BS

Agenderle

Mutations

Einstein’s Error — The Confusion of Laws With Their Effects

The Museum Is the Art

Polly Sooth the Air Rage

The Truth

The Darkness

Morality = STDs?

Fulfilling the Moral Duty To Disdain

MustWinForSure

Choice

Real Design

The Two Rules of Great Programming

Cynicism

The End of the Nerds

Poverty — Humanity’s Damage Control

Berners-Lee’s Rating System = Google

The Secret Anti-MP3 Trick In “Independent Women” and “You Sang To Me”

ID and the Large Hadron Collider Scare

Not A Bluff

The Fall of Microsoft

Life Sucks When You’re Not Winning

Aware

The Old-Fashioned Way

The Old People Who Pop Into Existence

Theodicy — A Big Stack of Papers

The Designed, Cause-and-Effect Brain

Mosaics

IC Counterarguments

The Capitalist’s Imaginary Line

Education Isn’t Everything

I Don’t Know

Funny iPhone Party-Poopers

Avoiding Conflict At All Costs

Behavior and Free Will, Unconfused

“Reduced To” Absurdum

Suzie and Bubba Redneck — the Carriers of Intelligence

Everything You Need To Know About Haldane’s Dilemma

Darwin + Hitler = Baloney

Meta-ware

Designed For Combat

Speed Racer R Us

Bold — Uh-huh

Conscious of Consciousness

Future Perfect

Where Real and Yahoo Went Wrong

The Purpose of Surface

Eradicating Religion Won’t Eradicate War

Documentation Overkill

A Tale of Two Movies

The Changing Face of Sam Adams

Dinesh D’Souza On ID

Why Quintic (and Higher) Polynomials Have No Algebraic Solution

Translation of Paul Graham’s Footnote To Plain English

What Happened To Moore’s Law?

Goldston On ID

The End of Martial Law

The Two Faces of Evolution

A Fine Recommendation

Free Will and Population Statistics

Dennett/D’Souza Debate — D’Souza

Dennett/D’Souza Debate — Dennett

The Non-Euclidean Geometry That Wasn’t There

Defective Attitude Towards Suburbia

The Twin Deficit Phantoms

Sleep Sync and Vertical Hold

More FUD In Your Eye

The Myth of Rubbernecking

Keeping Intelligent Design Honest

Failure of the Amiga — Not Just Mismanagement

Maxwell’s Honey Do?

End Unsecured Debt

The Digits of Pi Cannot Be Sequentially Generated By A Computer Program

Faster Is Better

Goals Can’t Be Avoided

Propped-Up Products

Ignoring ID Won’t Work

The Crabs and the Bucket

Communism As A Side Effect of the Transition To Capitalism

Google and Wikipedia, Revisited

National Geographic’s Obesity BS

Cavemen

Theodicy Is For Losers

Seattle Redux

Quitting

Living Well

A Memory of Gateway

Is Apple’s Font Rendering Really Non-Pixel-Aware?

Humans Are Complexity, Not Choice

A Subtle Shift

Moralism — The Emperor’s New Success

Code Is Our Friend

The Edge of Religion

The Dark Side of Pixel-Aware Font Rendering

The Futility of DVD Encryption

ID Isn’t About Size or Speed

Blood-Curdling Screams

ID Venn Diagram

Rich and Good-Looking? Why Libertarianism Goes Nowhere

FUV — Fear, Uncertainty, and Vista

Malware Isn’t About Total Control

Howard = Second Coming?

Doomsday? Or Just Another Sunday

The Real Function of Wikipedia In A Google World

Objective-C Philosophy

Clarity From Cisco

2007 Macworld Keynote Prediction

FUZ — Fear, Uncertainty, and Zune

No Fear — The Most Important Thing About Intelligent Design

How About A Rational Theodicy

Napster and the Subscription Model

Intelligent Design — Introduction

The One Feature I Want To See In Apple’s Safari.