Darel Rex Finley in PhotoBooth

Taking An Early Retirement

2009.08.15   prev     next

Throughout the 1990s, Apple was caught between a rock and a hard place. On the one hand, they needed to have a significantly different (and significantly better) product than Microsoft in order for anyone to have a reason to buy it. But on the other hand, it was because they had a significantly different — and therefore significantly incompatible with what most people were using — product, that most people wouldn’t even consider buying it.

To succeed, Apple needed to find a way be compatible with Windows to the degree necessary to defray concern about incompatibility in the minds of most computer buyers, while at the same time not becoming just another maker of Windows PCs. These contradictory goals, both needed for Apple to have big market success, kept Apple down throughout the 1980s and ’90s.

Then, Apple found a way out: the iPod. The iPod had these critical characteristics:

  • It was a product that no companies were making very well, which gave Apple the opportunity to make something dramatically better than anything else on the market.

  • It was a product that Microsoft wasn’t making.

  • It was a product that Microsoft couldn’t take over with Windows-dominance leverage. In other words, as long as Apple made sure that the iPod worked perfectly well with Windows, then the dominance of Windows would not be a reason for the typical consumer to want to buy a Microsoft-branded or Microsoft-approved player.

Microsoft played their standard cards against the iPod: First, they came out with PlaysForSure, whose name alone was obviously intended to make consumers fear that they would have incompatibility problems if they bought an iPod. And PlaysForSure was licensed to virtually all significant manufacturers of portable digital music players other than Apple, a fact that was heavily played-up to imply that, “Everyone’s going with PlaysForSure — if you’re not, you’re going to be left out.”

But consumers weren’t fooled. The iPod worked great with a Windows PC, and everyone knew it. To succeed with a you’ll-be-sorry-you-didn’t-buy-PlaysForSure strategy, what Microsoft really needed to do was to break compatibility between Windows and the iPod (or iTunes, more specifically). But there wasn’t any way for them to do that without getting immediately slammed by antitrust. Inviting everyone to write apps for Windows, then purposely breaking one of the most popular Windows apps — iTunes — in order to drive its authors out of the music player market, would have earned not just expensive and wearying court battles, but swift and certain remedies from the antitrust division of our government. Microsoft would be lucky to have any music-related products at all after such remedies.

So then they tried again with Zune. That didn’t work either, and for the same reason: no iPod-Windows incompatibilities to exploit. But it did allow Microsoft to gobble up a big chunk of the non-iPod portion of the market from its former PlaysForSure partners. Backstabbing and devouring its partners is something Microsoft can do, and does quite well.

Now we’re seeing the same scenario unfolding with the iPhone, only with a much greater potential than the (wildly successful) iPod had. And now the Mac uses the same processors as Windows PCs, and can run Windows natively — the perfect insurance policy for consumers worried about a few critical Windows apps they think they might not be able to live without.

I think Bill Gates saw the writing on the wall, and decided to take an early retirement: Hand the reigns over to Ballmer and watch him run it into the ground. Ballmer’s doing the only thing he knows how to do — try to copy the iPhone (“Windows phone”), and hope that consumers will flock to the Microsoft copy out of fear that sticking with the iPhone will cause them problems. But that fear just doesn’t exist.

Ballmer, these are your options:

  1. Preside over Microsoft’s rapid decline for the next decade or so.

  2. Bet the farm that the antitrust people won’t have the nads to do anything really effective to Microsoft — purposely and repeatedly break iTunes, while offering your own iPhone imitation. Maybe call it the “WorksForSure” phone.

  3. Take an early retirement.

prev     next

 

Hear, hear

prev     next

Favorite links

Starbucks

Apple

RoughlyDrafted

Daring Fireball

Joel on Software

Macalope

Red Meat

Despair, Inc.

Zombie Survival Guide plus Dawn of the Dead (also check out HVZ)

Charlie Superfly Check “The First Time” to hear what she actually sang in the competition. HowardTV ripped it out and spliced in utter crap they had her sing later.

Real Solution #9 (Mambo Mania Mix) over stock nuke tests.

Ernie & Bert In Casino

Great Explanation of Star Wars

Best Superbowl 43 Commercial

Kirk & Spock get Closer

TV: Survivor; Sons of Anarchy; Cash Cab; The Millionaire Matchmaker; Damages; 24

My vote for best commercial ever.

Congratulations to Kaiser Tangso for figuring out what the title of my site means!

Previous articles

Apple’s On the Right Track

Mountains of Evidence

What We Do

Hope Conquers All

Humans Are Special — Just Not That Special

Life = Survival of the Fittest

Excuse Me, We’re Going To Build On Your Property

No Trademark iWorries

Knowing

Twisted Excuses

The Fall of Google

Real Painters

The Meaning of Kicking Ass

How To Really Stop Casual Movie Disc Ripping

The Solitary Path of the High-Talent Programmer

Fixing, Not Preaching

Why Blackmail Is Still Illegal

Designers Cannot Do Anything Imaginable

Wise Dr. Drew

Rats In A Too-Small Cage

Coming To Reason

Everything Isn’t Moving To the Web

Pragmatics, Not Rights

Grey Zone

Methodologically Dogmatic

The Purpose of Language

The Punishment Defines the Crime

Two Many Cooks

Pragmatism

One Last Splurge

Making Money

What Heaven and Hell Are Really About

America — The Last Suburb

Hoarding

What the Cloud Isn’t For

Diminishing Returns

What You’re Seeing

What My Life Needs To Be

Taking An Early Retirement

Office Buildings

A, B, C, D, Pointless Relativity

Stephen Meyer and Michael Medved — Where Is ID Going?

If You Didn’t Vote — Complain Away

iPhone Party-Poopers Redux

What Free Will Is Really About

Spectacularly Well

Pointless Wrappers

PTED — The P Is Silent

Out of Sync

Stupid Stickers

Security Through Normalcy

The Case For Corporate Bonuses

Movie Copyrights Are Forever

Permitted By Whom?

Quantum Cognition and Other Hogwash

The Problem With Message Theory

Bell’s Boring Inequality and the Insanity of the Gaps

Paying the Rent At the 6 Park Avenue Apartments

Primary + Reviewer — An Alternative IT Plan For Corporations

Yes Yes Yes

Feelings

Hey Hey Whine Whine

Microsoft About Microsoft Visual Microsoft Studio Microsoft

Hidden Purple Tiger

Forest Fair Mall and the Second Lamborghini

Intelligent Design — The Straight Dope

Maxwell’s Demon — Two Real-World Examples

Zealots

Entitlement BS

Agenderle

Mutations

Einstein’s Error — The Confusion of Laws With Their Effects

The Museum Is the Art

Polly Sooth the Air Rage

The Truth

The Darkness

Morality = STDs?

Fulfilling the Moral Duty To Disdain

MustWinForSure

Choice

Real Design

The Two Rules of Great Programming

Cynicism

The End of the Nerds

Poverty — Humanity’s Damage Control

Berners-Lee’s Rating System = Google

The Secret Anti-MP3 Trick In “Independent Women” and “You Sang To Me”

ID and the Large Hadron Collider Scare

Not A Bluff

The Fall of Microsoft

Life Sucks When You’re Not Winning

Aware

The Old-Fashioned Way

The Old People Who Pop Into Existence

Theodicy — A Big Stack of Papers

The Designed, Cause-and-Effect Brain

Mosaics

IC Counterarguments

The Capitalist’s Imaginary Line

Education Isn’t Everything

I Don’t Know

Funny iPhone Party-Poopers

Avoiding Conflict At All Costs

Behavior and Free Will, Unconfused

“Reduced To” Absurdum

Suzie and Bubba Redneck — the Carriers of Intelligence

Everything You Need To Know About Haldane’s Dilemma

Darwin + Hitler = Baloney

Meta-ware

Designed For Combat

Speed Racer R Us

Bold — Uh-huh

Conscious of Consciousness

Future Perfect

Where Real and Yahoo Went Wrong

The Purpose of Surface

Eradicating Religion Won’t Eradicate War

Documentation Overkill

A Tale of Two Movies

The Changing Face of Sam Adams

Dinesh D’Souza On ID

Why Quintic (and Higher) Polynomials Have No Algebraic Solution

Translation of Paul Graham’s Footnote To Plain English

What Happened To Moore’s Law?

Goldston On ID

The End of Martial Law

The Two Faces of Evolution

A Fine Recommendation

Free Will and Population Statistics

Dennett/D’Souza Debate — D’Souza

Dennett/D’Souza Debate — Dennett

The Non-Euclidean Geometry That Wasn’t There

Defective Attitude Towards Suburbia

The Twin Deficit Phantoms

Sleep Sync and Vertical Hold

More FUD In Your Eye

The Myth of Rubbernecking

Keeping Intelligent Design Honest

Failure of the Amiga — Not Just Mismanagement

Maxwell’s Honey Do?

End Unsecured Debt

The Digits of Pi Cannot Be Sequentially Generated By A Computer Program

Faster Is Better

Goals Can’t Be Avoided

Propped-Up Products

Ignoring ID Won’t Work

The Crabs and the Bucket

Communism As A Side Effect of the Transition To Capitalism

Google and Wikipedia, Revisited

National Geographic’s Obesity BS

Cavemen

Theodicy Is For Losers

Seattle Redux

Quitting

Living Well

A Memory of Gateway

Is Apple’s Font Rendering Really Non-Pixel-Aware?

Humans Are Complexity, Not Choice

A Subtle Shift

Moralism — The Emperor’s New Success

Code Is Our Friend

The Edge of Religion

The Dark Side of Pixel-Aware Font Rendering

The Futility of DVD Encryption

ID Isn’t About Size or Speed

Blood-Curdling Screams

ID Venn Diagram

Rich and Good-Looking? Why Libertarianism Goes Nowhere

FUV — Fear, Uncertainty, and Vista

Malware Isn’t About Total Control

Howard = Second Coming?

Doomsday? Or Just Another Sunday

The Real Function of Wikipedia In A Google World

Objective-C Philosophy

Clarity From Cisco

2007 Macworld Keynote Prediction

FUZ — Fear, Uncertainty, and Zune

No Fear — The Most Important Thing About Intelligent Design

How About A Rational Theodicy

Napster and the Subscription Model

Intelligent Design — Introduction

The One Feature I Want To See In Apple’s Safari